Why this matters under SBTi v2
- Assurance providers will want a traceable source for each material number.
- Without supplier specific evidence, year on year movements are hard to defend.
- Gaps tend to grow without a single source of supplier truth.
Common symptoms
- Mostly spend based data on the top Scope 3 categories.
- Supplier emissions saved in scattered PDFs and emails.
- No version log or method notes alongside the numbers.
Recommended actions
- Build a Scope 3 evidence pack starting with the suppliers behind your top three categories.
- Pull public disclosures and CDP responses before sending any supplier survey.
- Document methodology and version history for every material category.
- Engage suppliers only for the gaps that materially shift the answer.
How DitchCarbon helps
- Source linked supplier emissions and target signals in one place.
- Coverage across millions of organisations to fill the spend based gaps fast.
- Methodology and version notes built into the supplier dataset.
Not sure if this profile fits you? Run the SBTi v2 Impact Checker to see your scores and a personalised action plan.
Free diagnostic
See how SBTi v2 affects your company
Five minutes. Four scores. A personalised action plan with owners and timing.
Start the checker